When a competitor comes up in a deal, salespeople generally pick one of two approaches.
1. The Quick Dismiss
Sometimes, a competitor mention is just a throwaway: “We’re also looking at ACME.”
Perfect. This is your cue for a short and effective argument that explains why this competitor is not a good fit for your ICP. (you know who’s your ICP, right? right?)
It could be a deal-breaker flaw (“their reporting is limited to CSV exports unless you upgrade”), or an obvious mismatch (“they’re built for startups, you’re at 1,000+ seats”).
The goal? Shut it down and move on.
2. The Scenic Route
When the competitor is a serious contender, the Quick Dismiss is not enough to convince. Even worse, it is very likely to backfire, as it will be perceived as an attempt by the salesperson to deceive the buyer.
In those cases, you need to go full Obi-Wan.
Instead of going head-to-head, the idea is to guide the prospect, so they convince themselves that there’s a mismatch between their needs and the competing product, and that your product is a better fit for them.
By asking strategic questions on the prospect’s needs and context, the salesperson steers the conversation towards areas where your product is a better fit for them.
- “How important is it for you to customize your onboarding flows by persona?”
- “Are integrations with HubSpot and Slack must-haves from day one?”
Then, when they answer, reframe:
“Got it. I understand why you are considering Hubspot as well. But they price those features as Add-ons, and users complain that they hit paywalls constantly. Our Pro solution includes all that. With Hubspot, you are looking at $4,000 for add-ons alone.”
It's not arguing. It's helping the prospect make the right decision and positioning themselves as a trusted adviser rather than a pushy salesperson.
Your battlecard should include both approaches.